Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) scores 10.9 points higher (45.4 vs 34.5) but costs 6.5× as much to run the benchmark ($365 vs $56.4; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 34.5, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) when 34.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 45.4 | +31.6% GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is 31.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $56.36 | $364.95 | +547.5% GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is 6.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.74s | 18.82s | +19.6% GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is 19.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 31.6% more intelligence, 547.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill