Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs gpt-oss-120b (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)
gpt-oss-120b (High) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 66.4% less intelligence, 117.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 18.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 11.6 | −66.4% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 66.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $56.36 | $122.71 | +117.7% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 2.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.41s | 12.38s | +18.9% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 18.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)gpt-oss-120b (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gpt-oss-120b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gpt-oss-120b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill