Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 3.4 points higher (37.9 vs 34.5) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($110 vs $56.4; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 37.9 | +9.9% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 9.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $56.36 | $109.55 | +94.4% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 94.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.41s | 49.53s | +375.8% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 375.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 9.9% more intelligence, 94.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 375.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill