Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Ember (Xhigh) scores 9.5 points higher (34.1 vs 24.6) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($95.7 vs $72.7; both mid-range class). Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.6 | 34.1 | +38.6% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 38.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $72.70 | $95.73 | +31.7% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 31.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.09s | 9.48s | −41.1% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 41.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 38.6% more intelligence, 31.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill