Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 12.9% less intelligence, 206.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 35.9 | −12.9% Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Lo… is 12.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $482.13 | +206.0% Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Lo… is 3.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 69.98s | 5.65s | −91.9% Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Lo… is 91.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/claude-sonnet-5-5-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/claude-sonnet-5-5-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill