Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 11.4 points higher (52.6 vs 41.2) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $158; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when you need intelligence above 41.2, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) when 41.2 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 52.6 | +27.7% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 27.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $2,407.24 | +1427.6% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 15× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 69.76s | 54.41s | −22.0% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 22.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 27.7% more intelligence, 1427.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 22.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Gemini 4 Argon (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/gemini-4-argon · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/gemini-4-argon?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill