Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs GLM-5.2 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)
GLM-5.2 (Max) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 18.2% less intelligence, 1230.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | GLM-5.2 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 33.7 | −18.2% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 18.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $2,097.29 | +1230.9% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 59.82s | 30.10s | −49.7% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 49.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)GLM-5.2 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/glm-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/glm-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill