Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)
GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 16.0% less intelligence, 13.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 39.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 34.6 | −16.0% GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) is 16.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $179.33 | +13.8% GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) is 13.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 75.35s | 45.86s | −39.1% GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) is 39.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 41.30 for $175.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/gpt-5-6-luna-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/gpt-5-6-luna-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill