Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Granite 4.2 8B
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Granite 4.2 8B by IBM? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 30.1 points higher (41.2 vs 11.1) but costs 3.0× as much to run the benchmark ($158 vs $53.1; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Granite 4.2 8B.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Granite 4.2 8B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 11.1 | −73.1% Granite 4.2 8B is 73.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $53.07 | −66.3% Granite 4.2 8B is 66.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 69.76s | 63.67s | −8.7% Granite 4.2 8B is 8.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.06 / $0.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Granite 4.2 8B vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 73.1% less intelligence, 66.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 8.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Granite 4.2 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (High) scores 32.90 for $47.9.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Granite 4.2 8BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/granite-4-2-8b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/granite-4-2-8b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill