Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Inkling 2 Small
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Inkling 2 Small by Thinking Machines? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-06.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)
Inkling 2 Small vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 11.6% less intelligence, 310.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Inkling 2 Small | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 30.6 | −11.6% Inkling 2 Small is 11.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $192.70 | $791.81 | +310.9% Inkling 2 Small is 4.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 69.45s | 20.92s | −69.9% Inkling 2 Small is 69.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.30 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
- Inkling 2 Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Inkling 2 SmallToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/inkling-2-small · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/inkling-2-small?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill