Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Kimi K3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Kimi K3 (Max) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Max) scores 2.4 points higher (43.6 vs 41.2) but costs 23× as much to run the benchmark ($3658 vs $158; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 41.2, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) when 41.2 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Kimi K3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 43.6 | +5.8% Kimi K3 (Max) is 5.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $3,658.07 | +2221.4% Kimi K3 (Max) is 23× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 67.44s | 50.42s | −25.2% Kimi K3 (Max) is 25.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Max) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 5.8% more intelligence, 2221.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Kimi K3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Kimi K3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/kimi-k3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/kimi-k3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill