Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 77.7% less intelligence, 157.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 9.2 | −77.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 77.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $405.10 | +157.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 59.82s | 6.44s | −89.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 89.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill