Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 14.2 points higher (57.6 vs 43.4) but costs 26× as much to run the benchmark ($8708 vs $330; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 43.4, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when 43.4 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 57.6 | +32.7% Claude Opus 5.5 (Max,… is 32.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $8,708.20 | +2536.9% Claude Opus 5.5 (Max,… is 26× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 318.48s | 626.13s | +96.6% Claude Opus 5.5 (Max,… is 96.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 32.7% more intelligence, 2536.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 96.6% slower end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/claude-opus-5-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/claude-opus-5-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill