Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) scores 34.9 points higher (43.4 vs 8.5) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($330 vs $25.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when you need intelligence above 8.5, and DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) when 8.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 8.5 | −80.4% DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is 80.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $25.37 | −92.3% DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is 92.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 324.30s | 13.85s | −95.7% DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is 95.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.32 / $0.89 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 80.4% less intelligence, 92.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 95.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/deepseek-v3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/deepseek-v3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill