Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 31.6% less intelligence, 486.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 29.7 | −31.6% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 31.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $1,935.39 | +486.0% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 5.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 327.94s | 24.38s | −92.6% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 92.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/gemini-3-1-pro-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/gemini-3-1-pro-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill