Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) scores 5.5 points higher (43.4 vs 37.9) but costs 3.0× as much to run the benchmark ($330 vs $110; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when you need intelligence above 37.9, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash when 37.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 37.9 | −12.7% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 12.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $109.55 | −66.8% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 66.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 318.48s | 49.53s | −84.4% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 84.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 12.7% less intelligence, 66.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill