Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 1.7 points higher (45.1 vs 43.4) but costs 7.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2359 vs $330; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 43.4, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when 43.4 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 45.1 | +3.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 3.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $2,358.74 | +614.2% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 7.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 354.68s | 28.35s | −92.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 92.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 3.9% more intelligence, 614.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill