Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 22.4% less intelligence, 304.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.5% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 33.7 | −22.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 22.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $1,336.09 | +304.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 4.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 347.67s | 60.71s | −82.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 82.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill