Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) scores 35.6 points higher (43.4 vs 7.8) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($330 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 7.8 | −82.0% Solar Pro 3 is 82.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $159.22 | −51.8% Solar Pro 3 is 51.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 324.30s | 18.89s | −94.2% Solar Pro 3 is 94.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 82.0% less intelligence, 51.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 94.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill