Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Command-R+ (Apr '24)

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Command-R+ (Apr '24). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.40
Total cost
-
CohereCommand-R+ (Apr '24)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.30
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Command-R+ (Apr '24)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.45.3−79.9% Command-R+ (Apr '24) is 79.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.10sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itCommand-R+ (Apr '24): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/command-r-plus-04-2024 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/command-r-plus-04-2024?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill