Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) vs GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) vs GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7 (Max)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
40.70
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7 (Max)GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)40.714.9−63.4% GLM-4.7-Flash (Reason… is 63.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)30.58s32.65s+6.8% GLM-4.7-Flash (Reason… is 6.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.07 / $0.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.7 (Max): what beats itGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7/glm-4-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7/glm-4-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill