Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) by Anthropic or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Wonder (Max)
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Claude Opus 4.8 (Max): 25.4% more intelligence, 15.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 12.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 52.4 | +25.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 25.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $6,873.86 | $5,786.78 | −15.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 15.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.92s | 41.43s | +12.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 12.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Opus 4.8 (Max)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill