Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) by Anthropic or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) scores 1.6 points higher (41.8 vs 40.2) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($6874 vs $3172; both flagship class). Pick Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 Max.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 40.2 | −3.8% Qwen3.8 Max is 3.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $6,873.86 | $3,172.37 | −53.8% Qwen3.8 Max is 53.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.92s | 62.83s | +70.2% Qwen3.8 Max is 70.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 4.8 (Max): 3.8% less intelligence, 53.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Claude Opus 4.8 (Max)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill