Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Claude Opus 5 (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Claude Opus 5 (Medium) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)
Claude Opus 5 (Medium) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback): 16.4% less intelligence, 25.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | Claude Opus 5 (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.6 | 44.8 | −16.4% Claude Opus 5 (Medium) is 16.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,172.43 | $2,731.91 | +25.8% Claude Opus 5 (Medium) is 25.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.63s | 12.85s | −65.9% Claude Opus 5 (Medium) is 65.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $5.00 / $25.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Claude Opus 5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)Claude Opus 5 (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/claude-opus-5-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/claude-opus-5-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill