Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 40.8 points higher (53.6 vs 12.8) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2172 vs $1319; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.6 | 12.8 | −76.1% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 76.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,172.43 | $1,318.62 | −39.3% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 39.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 40.99s | 16.78s | −59.1% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 59.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback): 76.1% less intelligence, 39.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.1% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill