Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 45.8 points higher (53.6 vs 7.8) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($2172 vs $159; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.6 | 7.8 | −85.4% Solar Pro 3 is 85.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,172.43 | $159.22 | −92.7% Solar Pro 3 is 92.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.81s | 18.94s | −44.0% Solar Pro 3 is 44.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback): 85.4% less intelligence, 92.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 44.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill