Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)
Qwen3.7 Max vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback): 30.3% less intelligence, 164.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 23.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.3 | 29.5 | −30.3% Qwen3.7 Max is 30.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $860.33 | $2,277.12 | +164.7% Qwen3.7 Max is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.42s | 16.61s | +23.8% Qwen3.7 Max is 23.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-low/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-low/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill