Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback): 34.2% less intelligence, 6.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.2 | 33.7 | −34.2% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 34.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,626.81 | $1,737.18 | +6.8% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 6.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.80s | 21.59s | −1.0% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 1.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill