Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Solar Pro 4
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Solar Pro 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallba… scores 24.6 points higher (51.2 vs 26.6) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1627 vs $737; both premium class). Pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallba… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 4.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Solar Pro 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.2 | 26.6 | −48.0% Solar Pro 4 is 48.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,626.81 | $736.82 | −54.7% Solar Pro 4 is 54.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.68s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 4 vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback): 48.0% less intelligence, 54.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)Solar Pro 4Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/solar-pro4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/solar-pro4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill