Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-30.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… scores 31.7 points higher (57.0 vs 25.3) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($4766 vs $2923; both flagship class). Pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Large 4 Preview.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.0 | 25.3 | −55.6% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 55.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,765.91 | $2,923.39 | −38.7% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 38.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 133.13s | 24.42s | −81.7% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 81.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.70 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 55.6% less intelligence, 38.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/mistral-large-4-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/mistral-large-4-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill