Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Low) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 13.3 points higher (52.7 vs 39.4) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $1561; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 39.4, and Claude Opus 5 (Low) when 39.4 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Low) | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.4 | 52.7 | +33.8% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 33.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,560.91 | $5,324.10 | +241.1% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 3.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.45s | 280.51s | +2349.9% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 2349.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Claude Opus 5 (Low): 33.8% more intelligence, 241.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2349.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Opus 5 (Low)GPT-6 Astra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/gpt-6-astra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/gpt-6-astra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill