Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Low) by Anthropic or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Low) scores 13.6 points higher (39.4 vs 25.8) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1561 vs $993; both premium class). Pick Claude Opus 5 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Low) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.4 | 25.8 | −34.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 34.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,560.91 | $992.88 | −36.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 36.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.79s | 46.75s | +296.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 296.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Claude Opus 5 (Low): 34.5% less intelligence, 36.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 296.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude Opus 5 (Low)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill