Claude Opus 5 (Medium) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Medium) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Claude Opus 5 (Medium): 0.7% more intelligence, 83.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Medium) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.8 | 45.1 | +0.7% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 0.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,731.91 | $444.60 | −83.7% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 83.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.73s | 15.97s | +25.5% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 25.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude Opus 5 (Medium)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill