Claude Opus 5 (Medium) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Medium) by Anthropic or GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Medium) scores 19.8 points higher (44.8 vs 25.0) but costs 62× as much to run the benchmark ($2732 vs $44.3; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Medium) when you need intelligence above 25.0, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) when 25.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Medium) | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.8 | 25.0 | −44.2% GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is 44.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,731.91 | $44.32 | −98.4% GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is 98.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.14s | 5.82s | −55.7% GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is 55.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) vs Claude Opus 5 (Medium): 44.2% less intelligence, 98.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Claude Opus 5 (Medium)GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/gpt-5-6-luna-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/gpt-5-6-luna-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill