Claude Opus 5 (Medium) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) scores 1.6 points higher (46.4 vs 44.8) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($4967 vs $2732; both flagship class). Pick Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Opus 5 (Medium).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Medium) | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.8 | 46.4 | +3.6% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 3.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,731.91 | $4,967.35 | +81.8% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 81.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.70s | 35.66s | +180.8% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 180.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs Claude Opus 5 (Medium): 3.6% more intelligence, 81.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 180.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Opus 5 (Medium)Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill