Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) scores 33.6 points higher (49.7 vs 16.1) but costs 7.1× as much to run the benchmark ($5868 vs $823; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 16.1, and Gemini 2.5 Pro when 16.1 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.7 | 16.1 | −67.6% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 67.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,867.76 | $822.85 | −86.0% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 86.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.31s | 27.94s | −20.9% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 20.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $1.25 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh): 67.6% less intelligence, 86.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 20.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)Gemini 2.5 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-xhigh/gemini-2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-xhigh/gemini-2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill