Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) scores 1.6 points higher (49.7 vs 48.1) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($5868 vs $2000; both flagship class). Pick Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Spark 1.3 (Max).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.7 | 48.1 | −3.2% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 3.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,867.76 | $2,000.35 | −65.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 65.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.31s | 63.86s | +80.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 80.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh): 3.2% less intelligence, 65.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-xhigh/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-xhigh/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill