Claude Opus 5 (Max) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Max) by Anthropic or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Max) scores 25.6 points higher (50.8 vs 25.2) but costs 17× as much to run the benchmark ($7275 vs $428; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Max) when you need intelligence above 25.2, and Qwen3.7 Plus when 25.2 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Max) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.8 | 25.2 | −50.4% Qwen3.7 Plus is 50.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,274.74 | $427.73 | −94.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 94.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.34s | 47.00s | −25.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 25.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Claude Opus 5 (Max): 50.4% less intelligence, 94.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude Opus 5 (Max)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill