Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) by Anthropic or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) scores 15.9 points higher (30.1 vs 14.2) but costs 3.9× as much to run the benchmark ($4925 vs $1264; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) when you need intelligence above 14.2, and Mistral Medium 3.5 when 14.2 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 14.2 | −52.8% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 52.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,924.80 | $1,263.80 | −74.3% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 74.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 104.36s | 17.90s | −82.8% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 82.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max): 52.8% less intelligence, 74.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max)Mistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill