Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) by Anthropic or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) scores 17.2 points higher (30.1 vs 12.9) but costs 53× as much to run the benchmark ($4925 vs $92.8; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) when you need intelligence above 12.9, and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning when 12.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 12.9 | −57.1% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 57.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,924.80 | $92.76 | −98.1% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 98.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 115.26s | 8.97s | −92.2% Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 92.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.06 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max): 57.1% less intelligence, 98.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max)Nemotron 3.5 LightningToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/nemotron-3-5-lightning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/nemotron-3-5-lightning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill