Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.30
Total cost
-
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Off the frontier
Intelligence
11.40
Total cost
$461
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.311.4−51.1% DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is 51.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$460.74— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.81s18.43s+70.5% DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is 70.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$2.00 / $4.00
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): what beats itDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/deepseek-r1-0120 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/deepseek-r1-0120?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill