Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.30
Total cost
-
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
39.50
Total cost
$526
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.339.5+69.5% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (… is 69.5% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$525.65— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.79s15.08s+39.8% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (… is 39.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$0.29 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): what beats itDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/deepseek-v4-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/deepseek-v4-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill