Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallba… scores 37.5 points higher (46.8 vs 9.3) but costs 23× as much to run the benchmark ($1027 vs $44.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallba… when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.8 | 9.3 | −80.1% Llama 4 Maverick is 80.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,027.40 | $43.98 | −95.7% Llama 4 Maverick is 95.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.89s | 11.18s | −24.9% Llama 4 Maverick is 24.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback): 80.1% less intelligence, 95.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-high/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-high/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill