Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallba… scores 5.5 points higher (41.5 vs 36.0) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($1268 vs $117; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallba… when you need intelligence above 36.0, and Muse Ember (Max) when 36.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.5 | 36.0 | −13.3% Muse Ember (Max) is 13.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,268.30 | $117.12 | −90.8% Muse Ember (Max) is 90.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.46s | 10.09s | −45.3% Muse Ember (Max) is 45.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Max) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback): 13.3% less intelligence, 90.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 45.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)Muse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-high/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-high/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill