Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallba… scores 22.7 points higher (46.8 vs 24.1) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1027 vs $502; both premium class). Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallba… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Mini 4.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.8 | 24.1 | −48.5% Solar Mini 4 is 48.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,027.40 | $502.02 | −51.1% Solar Mini 4 is 51.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.82s | 25.33s | +70.9% Solar Mini 4 is 70.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback): 48.5% less intelligence, 51.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-high/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-high/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill