Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 1.4 points higher (42.2 vs 40.8) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $622; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fall….
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.8 | 42.2 | +3.4% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 3.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $622.28 | $1,630.69 | +162.1% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.11s | 12.90s | +111.1% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 111.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback): 3.4% more intelligence, 162.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 111.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-medium/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-medium/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill