Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fall… scores 34.3 points higher (40.8 vs 6.5) but costs 8.5× as much to run the benchmark ($622 vs $73.6; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fall… when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.8 | 6.5 | −84.1% Llama 4 Scout is 84.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $622.28 | $73.56 | −88.2% Llama 4 Scout is 88.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.20s | 4.99s | −19.5% Llama 4 Scout is 19.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback): 84.1% less intelligence, 88.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)Llama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-medium/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-medium/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill