Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallbac… scores 49.5 points higher (56.0 vs 6.5) but costs 99× as much to run the benchmark ($7260 vs $73.6; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallbac… when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 6.5 | −88.4% Llama 4 Scout is 88.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,259.50 | $73.56 | −99.0% Llama 4 Scout is 99.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 385.69s | 4.99s | −98.7% Llama 4 Scout is 98.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback): 88.4% less intelligence, 99.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 98.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)Llama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill