Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) scores 7.7 points higher (28.1 vs 20.4) but costs 2.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1218 vs $451; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.1 | 20.4 | −27.4% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 27.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,218.17 | $450.76 | −63.0% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 63.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.27s | 6.74s | −27.3% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 27.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium): 27.4% less intelligence, 63.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 27.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-medium/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-medium/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill