Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) scores 2.9 points higher (28.1 vs 25.2) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1218 vs $428; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Plus.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.1 | 25.2 | −10.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 10.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,218.17 | $427.73 | −64.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 64.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.01s | 46.21s | +412.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 412.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium): 10.3% less intelligence, 64.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 412.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-medium/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-medium/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill